Travelling a bumpy road with a micromouse

My micromouse generates a lot of data. I log speeds, sensor readings, motor controller parameters. All sorts of things. Often that data just makes me worry. Most recently, I was noticing that there were some large variances at speed.

Micromouse is a race – among other things. If you cannot go fast, you are less likely to do well. I had noticed that the controllers were working hard at higher speeds, the mouse was less reliable than I liked and corners were less predictable. I looked hard at the controller code and could find nothing fundamentally wrong. I asked other builders for their opinions and a common theme came back in the answers. It was obvious in retrospect. At speed any mechanical defects are likely to have a greater effect.

Mechanical Issues

Remember that this mouse had its wheels re-built in a hotel room in Fort Worth, out of parts McGiver would have been unhappy with, so I am no longer expecting great performance. There is nothing the competitor can do about the surface of the contest maze. If it is bumpy, it is bumpy and that is an end to it. Everyone gets to run the same maze. What I needed was a way to find out how much mechanical defects in the mouse would affect its performance.

I know the bearings are not really good enough. I am reasonably happy with the stiffness of the chassis. Something I had never checked was the roundness of the wheels. My wheels are 3D printed and measure up pretty good but I never took the trouble to true them up properly on the lathe. They are nor permanently mounted and I tried to think of ways to reliably measure them. The trick is that everything performs just fine at low speed and I cannot measure them while they thunder round at 3000RPM or so.

Micromouse Tyres Tested

It took several days before the obvious solution occurred to me. Isn’t that often the way? What I can do is to make sure they are definitely not round and see how that affects the performance. Since my tyres are not glued to the rims, it is easy enough to fix a couple of layers of paper between the tyre and rim. I used 10mm squares of post-it note. These are self-adhesive so they won’t come flying out and each sheet is 0.1mm thick so I can get a reliable and repeatable experiment. I placed two such squares under each of the tyres on just on side to give a 0.2mm lump. The lumps were arranged to hit the ground together.

Results

First, let’s see what the mouse data looks like with the tyres as they normally run. Data is recorded from the encoders giving mouse speed in mm/s and from the gyro giving angular velocity in deg/s.

First at low speed
D = 720mm
V = 1500mm/s
A = 5000mm/s/sD4B-wheel-balance-normal-slow D4B-wheel-balance-normal-slow-gyro

And a bit faster
D = 2700mm
V = 2500mm/s
A = 8000mm/s/sD4B-wheel-balance-normal-fast D4B-wheel-balance-normal-fast-gyro

Clearly, speed and acceleration affect the mouse. As the speed gets higher, the mouse is less able to grip the ground and you can see the measured speed jumping around as, presumably, the tyres slip and grip the ground. The wheels on each side behave slightly differently and are unlikely to be properly balanced. Uneven motion of the wheels causes small, high-frequency rotations of the mouse. These get worse as speed and acceleration increase. Below about 1m/s, the mouse is remarkably stable and well-behaved. If I could get it to run that well at 3m/s, I would be very happy.

Induced problems

Then, the wheels get padded to make them out of round by 0.2mm. This was done pretty well at random, on one side only. The placement of the pads could have reinforced or cancelled out any existing defects. It is pretty clear from the results that the defects were not cancelled out though. Conditions for the test were otherwise exactly as before.

First at low speed
D = 720mm
V = 1500mm/s
A = 5000mm/s/sD4B-wheel-balance-padded-slowD4B-wheel-balance-padded-slow-gyro

And a bit faster
D = 2700mm
V = 2500mm/s
A = 8000mm/s/sD4B-wheel-balance-padded-fastD4B-wheel-balance-padded-fast-gyro

The pads made a huge difference. Everything about the mouse behaviour while under load got worse. Dramatically so at higher speed and acceleration. Interestingly, constant speed motion was still pretty good and the final position error was very small in all cases. It should not be surprising though to find that the grip of the tyre changes as it rotates. Remember that the pads were on one side only so this is a worst-case error.

Conclusions

What is to be learned? Principally, it is that there is no substitute for good micromouse tyres with a perfectly round section and that my existing tyres are less than perfect. Since the errors occur at the extremes of power (speed*acceleration) output, it might be a good idea to use a variable acceleration profile to help deal with high power manoeuvres. Finally, it would be really good to have a decent suspension system to help keep the tyres properly planted on the ground. I can think of ways to make that happen but not ways to build it.

Perhaps I should try harder to measure the existing wheels.

 

This entry was posted in Hardware, Micromouse. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Travelling a bumpy road with a micromouse

  1. Luison says:

    Hello,
    Why don’t you use foam tires? They are lighter, have much more grip and will cushion the bumpy road also.

    Thanks for your posts ^_^

  2. Peter Harrison says:

    If you can give a link to some suitable tyres, I would be happy to try them. Certainly, I think a good foam with a durable outer would be interesting to try.

  3. Luison says:

    There are plenty of them… For us, the best are tires from slot-world. Are M3 and have tons of grip (easily twice a normal mini-z tire).
    http://www.criccrac.com/productos.php?id_cat=75&id_marca=115&offset=12&ofertas=&novedades=&proximamente=

    Procomp are the softer ones. Procomp-4 the hardest. You have lots of diameters and widths.

    I don’t know if the foam of mini-z is that damn good tire, but some that seem good are:
    http://www.technicalrp.es/catalog/miniz-128-miniz-espumas-neumatico-c-1000_1995.html

    I suppose you can find those makers in your country ^_^

  4. Peter Harrison says:

    Thank you.

    I would never have found those.

  5. Luison says:

    Now you have the advantage… be fast, and use it in a properly way ;)

    A comparative grip between the slot-foam, the miniz-foam and your miniz-rubber would be great also ^_^

  6. dragonet80 says:

    Luison is right, at the moment everybody in Spain uses this kind of wheels for our linefollowers. I don’t know what other countries do. But not only the wheels, there are also special liquids and cleaners to provide even more grip.

  7. Peter Harrison says:

    Do you have any specific part numbers to recommend?

  8. Luison says:

    About?
    I think liquids are not allowed in micromouse.
    And in tires… if you buy an Scaleauto one with the compound “procomp”, it will be the right choice.
    But is hard to say just one tire… In 25.5, that I think is close to your tires. You have:
    Diameter wheel x width x diameter ring
    25.5x11x17 [SC-2109P]
    25.5x13x17 [SC-2110P]
    25.5x16x17 [SC-2114P]
    25.5x18x17 [SC-2112P]
    25.5x11x21 [SC-2119P]
    25.5x13x21 [SC-2620PB]

    A lot!!

    Maybe you can buy two with different diameter rings… and then different widths with that diameter ring…

    I think miniZ-foam tires are not better than slot ones… at least, they seem less “professional”. Just buy ones “very soft” and compare ^_^

  9. dragonet80 says:

    hmmm, Luison seems to be right:
    2.The contestant is permitted to remove dust and debris on the tires during a contest using adhesive tape,
    etc.; however, no solvents and the like may be used for the purpose of increasing friction.
    I was not aware of this.

Leave a Reply